🔗 Share this article

Europe breathed a deep collective sigh of relief on Monday, as the crisis sparked by the presentation of a new comprehensive peace framework for resolving the conflict appeared – temporarily – to have been stabilised. A senior US official spoke of "significant advancement" after diplomatic discussions in Geneva. On Monday night, Russian leadership made its countermove: an extensive attack of missile and drone strikes on Kyiv.

The Cycle of Negotiation and Warfare

The sequence of opposing developments captured the harsh reality of the recent timeframe. By day, political struggles are conducted: positive announcements are released from various governments. Significant resources is devoted on managing certain initiatives. By night, the Kremlin clearly shows the world that, for them, war remains the key method for achieving "resolution".

Nighttime Reality

As the offensive progressed into the early hours of Tuesday, the immediate reality of Ukraine's exposure was laid bare. Ukraine is equipped to monitor rocket firings from across the border, a capability enabled by current data. From witness perspectives, Ukrainian air force fighter jets that had been dispatched to counter approaching aerial threats roared overhead – advanced fighter aircraft supplied to Ukraine by European allies.

Shortly after, Kyiv's missile defense activated: several firings fired to intercept a Russian ballistic missile. This was a sophisticated defense system at work, probably supplied through allied countries. Every deployment shakes the surroundings, shaking the windows. The brief panic quickly transforms into sober acceptance: possibly the approaching threat won't cause damage this time, protecting urban areas from catastrophe and another blackout.

Continuous Dangers

Soon after, a automatic firearm fired at a aerial vehicle in the vicinity, part of a defensive team – probably Western-made equipment. Sadly, the bullets missed the opposing UAV – it continued its flight toward its objective.

Periodically, this persisted until dawn. Kyiv faced the early updates: seven people killed, devastation and infrastructure problems in numerous residences as a result of the evening attack. As typically, everyone still went about their day – experiencing conflict. But those entire period encapsulated Ukraine's critical military reliance on external assistance – a reliance that European nations are clearly incapable to substitute in the immediate future.

Ineffective Peace Efforts

The comprehensive proposal from US administration sparked intense emotion, debate and profound anxiety – and momentarily shifted focus from Ukraine's largest corruption scandal in years. Yet, we have experienced comparable situations, after previous diplomatic encounters and bilateral conferences.

Every new approach from US leadership adheres to the identical sequence: a diplomatic cavalry charge against Ukraine, which Kyiv, with other European capitals, succeeds in resisting. They stabilise the situation but never actually achieve victory. This pattern will, certainly, persist.

Strategic Calculations

It is easy to blame certain parties of consistently pushing Moscow's conditions. But that does not seem to be the whole story. US administration works based on a assumption familiar among international relations experts: you cannot secure via talks what you have been unable to protect through force. The US administration believes that it is unfeasible to compel Moscow to surrender the territory that it presently holds in Ukraine's occupied territories.

The problem is that while acknowledging this situation, Washington does nothing to discourage Russia, through words or deeds, from believing that the current condition will not shift further in its advantage in the months ahead.

Conflicting Perspectives

Therefore, the Kremlin is convinced that duration works to their advantage – that Ukraine and its partners are approaching exhaustion. Their incentive to agree to terms that does not give them the maximum possible gain is almost completely absent. There may be multiple initiatives to stop fighting, but they will continue as long as Russia's leadership remains supremely confident in the result.

On the contrary, Kyiv believes that Ukraine can still hold out, progressively conceding civilians and areas but averting a entire defensive failure until situations evolve in its favour.

Current Realities

Factually, there are no actual prerequisites for a truce. Now, personal considerations are becoming relevant: personal goals to mediate resolution and obtain worldwide acknowledgment, and the government's double obstacles – on one hand, not to alienate a key ally, and on the other, to unite the population around the country's interests against any proposal Kyiv finds unacceptable, so that their focus does not switch to domestic problems. And although their task will now be considerably more difficult after latest incidents, it remains very improbable that this will change their overall approach.

These two forces are influencing discussions.

Summary and Prospects

It took a only one week to terminate the suggested clauses of the current initiative. Forceful and unpredictable management of the matter by American leadership, pushback by Ukraine and the other European countries, along with soothing efforts of diplomats, and finally, recent disclosures, all did their job.

While new initiatives based on previous concepts are forthcoming, Kyiv, London and other allied nations should arrive at a critical understanding: Ukraine and Europe will only be able to fend off political attacks from Washington that are based on Russian demands and reflect particular unwillingness to modify developments, if they stand together and improve their protective measures at a considerably quicker tempo. If they do, no combination of diplomatic or military actions will be able to break them. In the meantime, Ukraine's ability to defend against evening bombardments will, for the predictable period, largely rely on continued Western support.